XenonStack Recommends

Autonomous Agents

Building Autonomous Agents for Software Testing

Dr. Jagreet Kaur Gill | 28 August 2024

Building Autonomous Agents for Software Testing
20:56
Embracing Generative Agents for Advanced Testing

AI Agents for Software Testing

Software testing is a vital part of software development, as it ensures that the software meets the requirements, specifications, and expectations of the users and stakeholders. However, software testing can also be challenging and tedious, as it involves designing, executing, and evaluating test cases, as well as identifying, reporting, and fixing defects. Moreover, software testing can be time-consuming and costly, as it requires a lot of human resources, tools, and infrastructure. 

Fortunately, Artificial Intelligence (AI) can offer a solution to these problems, by providing Autonomous Agents that can automate and optimize the software testing process. AI agents are software systems that can perform tasks, make decisions, and interact with other agents or humans, based on some goals or objectives. AI agents can leverage generative AI and natural language processing (NLP) to generate data, scenarios, or behaviors that can be used for testing purposes. Generative AI, a subset of AI, is dedicated to producing fresh content like text, images, audio, or video, derived from given input or context. Meanwhile, NLP, another branch of AI, specializes in examining, comprehending, and generating natural language, encompassing speech or text. 

How can autonomous agents with AI help in Software Testing?   

Generative agents can help in testing in various ways, such as:  

1. Generating Synthetic Datasets for testing purposes, such as user profiles, transactions, images, text, etc. This can reduce the need for manual data creation or collection and increase the coverage and quality of the test data.  

2. Generating scenarios or test cases based on the software's requirements, specifications, or user stories can automate the test design process and ensure that all the relevant aspects and edge cases are covered.  

3. Generating behaviors or actions that mimic the software's users, customers, or adversaries. This can simulate different types of interactions and situations that the software may encounter in the real world and test its functionality, performance, security, and usability. 

Benefits of AI Agents in Software Testing

Benefits of AI in Software Testing

By using autonomous agents for software testing, we can achieve several benefits, such as: 

Automating tasks that are repetitive, boring, or complex 

Software testing involves many repetitive, boring, or complex tasks, such as data generation, test case design, test execution, defect detection, and defect reporting. These tasks can consume a lot of time, effort, and resources and introduce human errors and biases.  

Generative agents can help automate these tasks by generating data, scenarios, or behaviors that can be used for testing purposes. They use natural language to communicate with the software and analyse and report the results. This saves time, effort, and resources and reduces human errors and biases. 

Providing more Test Coverage and Quality 

Software testing needs to provide sufficient test coverage and quality, to ensure that the software meets the requirements, specifications, and expectations of the users and stakeholders.  

Providing adequate test coverage and quality can be challenging, especially when the software has many features, functions, and scenarios, or when the software needs to handle diverse and dynamic data, interactions, and situations.  

Generative agents can help provide more test coverage and quality by generating realistic and diverse data sets, scenarios, or behaviors that can cover all the relevant aspects and edge cases of the software. This increases the software's confidence and reliability and reveals hidden or unknown defects. 

Detecting defects quickly and accurately 

Software testing needs to detect defects quickly and accurately to ensure that the software is free of errors and bugs and that it can be delivered on time and within budget. Detecting defects quickly and accurately can be difficult, especially when the software is complex, large, or distributed or when the defects are subtle, rare, or intermittent.  

Generative agents can help detect defects quickly and accurately by using natural language to communicate with the software and analyze and report the results. This improves the feedback and communication between the testers, developers, and users and facilitates defect resolution and verification. 

Challenges and opportunities for Multi-Agent systems 

AI agents for software testing are not without their challenges and limitations, such as: 

Data Quality and Availability 

  • AI agents rely on data to generate outputs, but the data may not always be accurate, complete, or representative of the real world.  

  • The data may not always be available or accessible, due to privacy, security, or ethical issues. Therefore, the quality and availability of the data need to be ensured and verified before using it for generative purposes. 

Evaluation and Validation 

  • AI agents may generate outputs that are novel, diverse, and creative, but they may also generate outputs that are irrelevant, incorrect, or harmful.  

  • The outputs need to be evaluated and validated to ensure that they meet the goals and objectives of the generative task and do not cause adverse effects or consequences. This may require human intervention, feedback, or supervision, which may add to the complexity and cost of the testing process. 

Explainability and Transparency

  • AI agents may use complex or black-box models to generate outputs that are not easily understood or explained by humans.  

  • The rationale and logic behind the outputs need to be made clear and transparent, especially when they have significant impacts or implications. This may require providing explanations, justifications, or evidence for the outputs and allowing users to inspect, modify, or control the generative process. 

On the other hand, AI agents for software testing also offer many opportunities and advantages, such as: 

Innovation and Creativity 

  • AI agents can generate outputs that are beyond the human imagination or capability, which can lead to new and innovative solutions or discoveries.  

  • For example, AI agents can generate adversarial or unexpected inputs that test the software's robustness and resilience or generate creative or alternative inputs that enhance the software's functionality and usability. 

Personalization and Customization  

  • AI agents can generate outputs that are tailored and adapted to the specific needs, preferences, or contexts of the users or stakeholders.  

  • For example, AI agents can generate data sets that reflect the diversity and variability of the user population or generate scenarios or behaviors that match the user profiles or personas. 

Collaboration and Communication  

  • AI agents can generate outputs that can facilitate collaboration and communication between the different parties involved in the software testing process, such as testers, developers, and users.  

  • For example, AI agents can generate natural language text that describes the test cases, results, or defects or generate visual or audio content that illustrates or demonstrates the test scenarios or behaviors. 

By leveraging the opportunities and advantages of AI agents, and by tackling the challenges and limitations of AI agents, we can achieve a more efficient, effective, and enjoyable software testing experience. 

How to build Autonomous Agents for Test Automation? 

Generative agents are artificial intelligence systems that can generate data, scenarios, or behaviors based on some rules or objectives. They can help in software testing by automating tasks, providing more test coverage, and detecting defects quickly using natural language. The building of these agents usually consists of 3 following steps 

Step 1: Define the goal or objective of the generative agent

The first step is to define what kind of data, scenario, or behavior the generative agent should generate and what criteria or constraints it should follow.  

For example, if we want to generate user profiles for testing a social media app, we need to define the attributes of the user profiles, such as name, age, gender, location, preferences, etc., and the range or distribution of the values for each attribute. We also need to define the quality and quantity of the data, such as how realistic, diverse, and representative the data should be, and how many user profiles we need to generate. 

Step 2: Choose the method or technique for generating the data, scenario, or behavior 

The second step is to choose the method or technique for generating the data, scenario, or behavior based on the generative agent's goal or objective.  

Different methods or techniques can be used, such as rule-based, probabilistic, or machine learning-based approaches. Depending on the complexity and diversity of the generation task, different methods may have different advantages and disadvantages.  

Methods available and their examples are as follows:  

  • Rule-based methods use predefined rules or logic to generate data, scenarios, or behaviors, which can be simple and fast, but may also be rigid and limited.  

  • Probabilistic methods use statistical or mathematical models to generate data, scenarios, or behaviours based on probabilities or distributions. These methods can be flexible and diverse but may also be uncertain and noisy.  

  • Machine learning methods use data-driven or neural network-based models to generate data, scenarios, or behaviors based on patterns or features learned from training data. These methods can be realistic and creative but may also be complex and opaque. 

Step 3: Implement and evaluate the generative agent 

The third step is to implement and evaluate the generative agent by using existing tools, frameworks, or libraries or by developing custom code. The generative agent should be tested and validated to ensure that it meets the goal or objective and that it produces high-quality and relevant outputs.  

For example, if we use a machine learning model to generate user profiles, we need to train the model on a large and diverse data set of real user profiles and then evaluate the model on a separate data set of user profiles to measure its accuracy, diversity, and novelty. We also need to compare the model with other methods or techniques, to assess its strengths and weaknesses. 

In addition to these three steps, there are some other points that might be beneficial to consider when building generative agents for testing, such as:

Integrate the generative agent with the software under test:  

  • The generative agent should be integrated with the software under test so that it can communicate and interact with the software and provide the generated data, scenarios, or behaviors as inputs for the software.  

  • This can be done by using APIs, interfaces, or protocols, that allow the generative agent and the software to exchange information and commands.  

  • For example, if we use a generative agent to generate user feedback to test a recommendation system, we need to integrate the generative agent with the recommendation system so that it can receive the recommendations from the system and provide feedback to the system. 

Monitor and update the generative agent:  

  • The generative agent should be monitored and updated regularly to ensure that it is functioning properly and aligned with the changes and updates of the software under test.  

  • This can be done using logs, metrics, or alerts that track and report the generative agent's performance and behavior.  

  • For example, if we use a generative agent to generate malicious attacks for testing a security system, we need to monitor and update the generative agent, to ensure that it is generating valid and relevant attacks and that it is not causing any damage or harm to the system or the environment. 

Developing an Autonomous Agents: A Scenario Illustration

To illustrate how generative agents can help in testing, let us consider a use case of testing a chatbot that provides customer service for an online store. The chatbot should be able to answer questions, provide information, and handle orders from customers. To test the chatbot, we can use generative agents to: 

  • Generate realistic and diverse customer profiles, such as names, ages, genders, locations, preferences, etc. This can help us test how the chatbot handles different types of customers and their needs. 

  • Generate scenarios or test cases based on the customer profiles and the chatbot's functionalities, such as asking questions, requesting information, placing orders, etc. This can help us test how the chatbot responds to different situations and requests. 

  • Generate behaviors or actions that simulate the customers' interactions with the chatbot, such as typing messages, clicking buttons, providing feedback, etc. This can help us test how the chatbot performs in terms of accuracy, speed, reliability, and satisfaction. 

The Role of Generative AI in Different Testing Domains  

Generative AI is transforming the landscape of software testing across multiple domains. By leveraging advanced algorithms and machine learning techniques, these intelligent systems can create a multitude of test cases, simulate user behavior, and generate data that closely mirrors real-world scenarios.  


Let's delve into how Generative AI is applied in different testing environments.  

Unit Testing 

In unit testing, Generative AI can automatically generate test cases based on the requirements and function signatures of the code. This not only speeds up the test creation process but also ensures a comprehensive set of tests that cover a wide range of input scenarios 

Integration Testing 

During integration testing, Generative AI can simulate the interactions between different software modules. It can predict potential points of failure and generate tests that focus on those critical integration paths, thereby enhancing the software's robustness. 

System Testing 

For system testing, Generative AI can create complex user scenarios that test the software's end-to-end functionality. It can also predict system behavior under various conditions, helping testers to focus on areas that are more likely to exhibit defects. 

Performance Testing 

Generative AI aids in performance testing by generating virtual users and data traffic that mimic real-world usage patterns. This allows testers to observe how the system performs under load and identify bottlenecks. 

Security Testing 

In security testing, Generative AI can generate a range of attacks and malicious inputs to test the software's resilience against security threats. It can also learn from past security incidents to anticipate new types of vulnerabilities. 

Technologies available  

There are many technologies available for building generative agents for testing, such as:  

1. Rule-based systems - Uses predefined rules or logic to generate data, scenarios, or behaviors. For example, Mockaroo is a tool that can generate realistic and random data sets based on user-defined schemas and rules.  

2. Probabilistic models - Use statistical or mathematical models to generate data, scenarios, or behaviors based on probabilities or distributions. For example, Faker is a Python library that can generate fake data, such as names, addresses, dates, etc., based on various locales and formats.  

3. Machine learning models - These use data-driven or neural network-based models to generate data, scenarios, or behaviors based on patterns or features learned from training data. For example, GPT-3 is a deep learning model that can generate natural language text based on a given prompt or context. 

Use Cases for Autonomous Software Testing

Some of the use cases of generative agents/technologies for software testing are: 

Image generation and manipulation 

  • This is the use case of generating or manipulating images for testing purposes, such as generating synthetic images for testing computer vision systems or manipulating images for testing image processing systems.  

  • For example, StyleGAN2 is a machine-learning model that can generate realistic and diverse images of faces, animals, landscapes, etc., based on a given style or attribute. 

Software and coding

  • Generating or modifying software code for testing purposes, such as generating code snippets for testing programming languages, or modifying code for testing software vulnerabilities.  

  • For example, CodeGPT is a machine-learning model that can generate or complete code based on a given language or task.  

Video creation

  • Generating or editing videos for testing purposes, such as generating synthetic videos for testing video analysis systems or editing videos for testing video editing systems.  

  • For example, a First-Order Motion Model is a machine-learning model that can generate or animate videos based on a given image or video. 

Synthetic Data Generation  

  • Generative AI models are adept at creating vast amounts of synthetic data that closely resemble real-world data.  

  • This is particularly useful in situations where privacy concerns or data scarcity limit the availability of actual data for testing purposes.  

Automated Test Case Creation  

  • By understanding software's requirements and functionalities, generative AI can automatically produce a variety of test cases, ensuring comprehensive coverage that includes edge cases often missed by manual processes. 

Performance Benchmarking  

  • Generative AI can simulate different load conditions to test software's performance under stress, providing insights into scalability and robustness.  

Security Penetration Testing  

  • AI-driven agents can intelligently probe systems to uncover potential security vulnerabilities, simulating cyber-attacks, and other threat scenarios 

Practical use case: Unit Testing with GitHub Copilot 

To illustrate the capabilities of generative AI in a testing environment, let's consider GitHub Copilot. 

In software testing, GitHub Copilot serves as an AI pair programmer, offering code suggestions to streamline the creation of test cases. It's particularly useful in unit testing, where it can suggest tests based on function behavior and expected outcomes. Developers can leverage Copilot to quickly generate a variety of test scenarios, ensuring comprehensive coverage and enhancing test quality. 

  • A developer working on a new feature can use GitHub Copilot to suggest relevant unit tests.  

  • Copilot analyses the code and proposes tests that cover typical use cases, edge cases, and error handling.  

  • This accelerates the test development process and helps maintain a high standard of code quality. 

GitHub Copilot in Action Across Testing Types: 

  • Unit Testing: GitHub Copilot can suggest entire blocks of unit tests based on the function signatures and logic within your code, making it easier to achieve thorough test coverage. 

  • Integration Testing: By understanding the interactions between different pieces of code, GitHub Copilot can generate integration tests that ensure modules work together seamlessly. 

  • End-to-End Testing: For comprehensive system checks, GitHub Copilot can help draft end-to-end test scenarios that simulate real-world user behaviour and interactions with the application. 

  • Performance Testing: GitHub Copilot can assist in scripting performance tests by generating code that mimics high-traffic conditions and user loads. 

  • Security Testing: When it comes to security, GitHub Copilot can contribute by creating tests that check for vulnerabilities and potential exploits in the codebase. 

Conclusion 

Generative agents are powerful and versatile tools that can help in testing software systems. They can generate data, scenarios, or behaviors that can improve the efficiency, effectiveness, and enjoyment of testing. They can also enable new possibilities and challenges for testing, such as generating adversarial or creative inputs that can test the robustness and resilience of the software. Generative agents are not a replacement for human testers, but rather a complement that can enhance their capabilities and productivity.